Building upon our Vulnerability Reports & Risk Assessments, we embarked on a comprehensive hands-on penetration testing of the enterprise healthcare network. This involved simulating real-world attacks to identify, exploit, and assess vulnerabilities, ensuring the network's defenses are robust and compliant with healthcare regulations.
Our penetration testing methodology is meticulously designed to uncover vulnerabilities and evaluate the effectiveness of existing security measures. The primary objectives include:
Thoroughly testing all critical systems and network segments to ensure no stone is left unturned.
Identifying and ranking vulnerabilities based on their potential impact and ease of exploitation.
Providing clear, prioritized recommendations to mitigate identified risks and enhance security measures.
Establishing a foundation for ongoing security assessments and proactive defenses against evolving threats.
A robust arsenal of penetration testing tools is essential for thorough coverage. We integrate both automated and manual utilities to ensure each layer of security is rigorously tested. Below are the key tools used and their specific applications in our testing phases:
Comprehensive port scans, OS detection, and script-based enumeration to identify open services and potential entry points.
Deep packet inspection for anomaly detection and monitoring suspicious traffic patterns within the network.
Proxy-based web application security testing with advanced crawler capabilities to identify and exploit web vulnerabilities.
Payload creation and exploit frameworks for simulating attacks against identified vulnerabilities.
Scheduled scans for known CVEs on servers, databases, and network appliances to identify and prioritize security weaknesses.
Bespoke Python/PowerShell scripts for enumerating internal systems, automating checks, and facilitating deeper penetration testing.
The initial phase of our hands-on penetration test focused on reconnaissance, aiming to understand the target environment’s external footprint and identify potential internal entry points. We employed a combination of passive (open-source intelligence) and active (network probing) methods.
Technique | Description | Tools | Findings |
---|---|---|---|
OSINT Gathering | Collected data from public forums, social media, and employee profiles. | Maltego, TheHarvester | Discovered employee email patterns and exposed system information. |
Network Scanning | Mapped subnets, discovered live hosts, and enumerated open ports. | Nmap, Netdiscover | Identified 15 active hosts with open ports, including SSH on port 22 and HTTP on port 80. |
Service Enumeration | Probed identified services for version info and known vulnerabilities. | Nmap Scripts, Netcat | Detected outdated Apache version with known CVE-2021-XXXX vulnerability. |
Social Engineering | Assessed human factors by simulating phishing attacks. | Social-Engineer Toolkit (SET) | Achieved a 10% click-through rate on phishing emails, indicating potential user awareness gaps. |
Through these techniques, we established a comprehensive map of the network's external and internal structures, identifying key areas for further vulnerability assessment and exploitation.
With the reconnaissance phase complete, we moved on to Vulnerability Identification & Analysis. This involved correlating gathered data with known exploits and misconfigurations to locate vulnerabilities that could be exploited by attackers.
Each discovered vulnerability was assigned a risk rating (low, medium, high, critical) based on its potential impact on healthcare data confidentiality, integrity, and availability. This comprehensive analysis informed our exploitation strategy in subsequent phases.
With vulnerabilities identified and analyzed, we proceeded to the exploitation phase. This involved simulating various attack scenarios to assess the network’s resilience and the effectiveness of existing security controls.
Utilized Metasploit to deploy payloads against the outdated Apache server, successfully gaining remote code execution.
Employed Burp Suite to intercept and manipulate HTTP requests, exploiting SQL injection vulnerabilities in the billing system.
Performed SQL injection attacks to bypass authentication mechanisms, gaining unauthorized access to patient records.
Conducted phishing campaigns to assess employee susceptibility, resulting in credential harvesting.
After gaining initial access, our next objective was to assess the network's segmentation and internal defenses by performing lateral movement & pivoting. This phase helps determine how far an attacker can traverse within the network and access higher-value assets.
Identified interconnected systems and mapped out the network topology using Nmap and custom scripts.
Extracted credentials from compromised systems using Mimikatz and custom PowerShell scripts.
Combined multiple exploits to escalate privileges and access sensitive systems.
Attempted to access and exfiltrate sensitive data from protected databases.
To evaluate the network's resilience against sustained threats, we simulate persistence mechanisms that attackers might employ to maintain access over time. This includes:
Creating automated tasks to re-establish access after system reboots.
Installing covert software to hide malicious activities and maintain stealthy access.
Embedding scripts in legitimate applications to execute unauthorized commands.
Opening hidden ports to allow direct access bypassing standard security measures.
Upon successful exploitation, our focus shifted to evaluating the network's ability to detect and respond to sustained threats. This involved simulating persistence techniques that attackers might use to maintain long-term access within the network.
These actions demonstrated the potential for an attacker to persist within the network, highlighting areas where security controls need strengthening. Specifically, we recommend implementing stricter access controls, regular credential rotation, and enhanced monitoring of administrative activities.
Clear, concise, and actionable reporting was paramount to ensure that the penetration testing findings could be effectively communicated to stakeholders. Our documentation process included detailed reports and interactive visualizations to facilitate understanding and decision-making.
Vulnerability: Apache HTTP Server 2.4.29 - CVE-2021-XXXX
Description: The identified Apache server version is vulnerable to remote code execution due to improper input validation.
Impact: An attacker could execute arbitrary code on the server, potentially gaining full control over the system.
Recommendation: Immediately update Apache to the latest stable version and implement input validation controls.
Each identified vulnerability was assigned a severity rating, remediation timeline, and follow-up plan to ensure the facility’s security posture continually improves post-assessment.
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework provides a structured approach to managing and mitigating cybersecurity risks. Our penetration testing aligns with its core functions:
Understanding the organizational environment to manage cybersecurity risk to systems, people, assets, data, and capabilities.
Implementing appropriate safeguards to ensure delivery of critical infrastructure services.
Developing and implementing activities to identify the occurrence of a cybersecurity event.
Taking action regarding a detected cybersecurity event to contain its impact.
Maintaining plans for resilience and restoring any capabilities or services impaired due to a cybersecurity event.
Penetration testing in a healthcare context is an ongoing process, not a one-time event. As new threats emerge and regulations evolve, so too must our security practices. Our future initiatives include:
Schedule quarterly and biannual penetration tests to validate new controls and uncover emerging vulnerabilities.
Extend testing to hybrid and cloud-based services to ensure comprehensive security coverage.
Conduct regular cybersecurity awareness programs to reduce social engineering risks and enhance overall security culture.
Incorporate automated security checks into the CI/CD pipeline to proactively identify and mitigate vulnerabilities during development.
Implement machine learning-based intrusion detection systems to identify and respond to sophisticated threats in real-time.
Adopt Zero Trust principles to ensure that trust is never assumed, and continuous verification is enforced across the network.
By embracing these proactive measures, the healthcare facility maintains an evolving defense strategy—protecting patient data, meeting compliance requirements, and preserving trust in its critical healthcare services.
New York, New York
Design: Sidiq Daniel © All rights reserved